Sunday, May 07, 2006
Everything you ever wanted to know about fostering children and what the Department of Community Resources and Employment does not want you to know.
The following account by Donna Jones begins a series of her accounts of Kafka-esque experiences she had from the time she was approved as a foster parent until all her foster children were illegally removed from her and she brought her story to injusticebusters.
Foster son number 1
My first foster son came to live with me in July 2004 when he was 14 years old. One evening we were driving down Circle Drive east. As I approached College Drive the amber lights were flashing. I reduced my speed from 90 kilometers to 60 kilometers. My foster son reached over and pushed the gear shift into park. We were lucky that there was no traffic at the time and that we were not involved in a serious accident. I have since had trouble with my transmission. My mechanic has advised putting in a new one.
I told Kendra Smith, his Social Worker, about the incident. She asked if we were alright. I said, “Yes” and that was the end of it. She did not enquire whether there was any damage to my car or suggest that I get the car checked.
Remember, I was a new foster parent, I did not know that the Dept. is responsible for damages caused by a foster child. Nor did the Social Worker inform me of this policy.
Chapter 8, policy 8.6 states; Where a foster family’s personal insurance or SFFA rider did not cover the cost for damages caused by children in care, the department may pay compensation. Such compensation may be provided for: deductibles, increased premiums, actual loss.
Amount: Actual amount supported by receipts or an amount based on estimates signed by an insurance adjuster or licensed contractor/dealer. Claims must be for repair or replacement to an equal or lesser value of the damaged item.
Imagine that, I could have got my car repaired but no one told me.
Thanks for sharing Kendra.
Foster son number 2
My second foster son came to me in August, 2004. He was also 14 years of age. While I was at work one day, he decided to put a fork in the microwave. He then went to the bathroom to do his business. Well lo and behold the micro wave caught on fire. I asked him why he would do such a thing.
He said, “I wanted to see if you would get mad.”
“Mad!” I said, “Why would I get mad? The microwave caught on fire, the kitchen could have caught on fire, we live in an apartment building and it could have caught on fire.” I said, “No I think mad is too mild a term for what I am feeling.”
His Social Worker, Nicole Meckelborg, and my Resource Worker, Jennifer Frank were present when I discovered the microwave. They did not say a word. Did either one of them offer to replace my micro wave? No!
Two days later I went to use the microwave and realized that I no longer had one and I started fuming. I called his Social Worker, Nicole Meckelborg and as usual she was not around. Nor was she in the habit of returning phone calls, (which you had better get used to if you want to be a foster parent). I then called my Resource Worker Jennifer Frank. She was not available either, but Jennifer did return my call. I told her, I was not a millionaire and I could not afford a new micro wave. I wanted something done about this and I wanted something done about it now! She said she would see what she could do and would call me back. Half an hour later she phoned me back. She told me that there would be a store voucher at the front desk after two o’clock which I could pick up. I thanked her and picked up my voucher and purchased a new micro wave.
Foster son No.2 had some very serious problems. He was a sniffer. I was at work one morning when foster son No.1’s probation officer came for a visit. Her name was Heather Carter. Foster son No.2 had just gone out. No.1 had just got out of the shower prior to the Heather’s arrival. Heather smelled a strong scent of ammonia. She asked, No.1 if he was sniffing. He said, “No, I just got out of the shower. I have a new foster brother and he just left. I think he is sniffing.”
Heather stayed and watched No.1 very closely for a little while. She determined that No.1 was not high and told No.1 to have me call her. I arrived ten minutes after she left. I called her immediately. She informed me of her findings. I was freaked right out. I had never dealt with anything like this in my life. I did not have a clue what to do or what to watch for! Thank heavens for Heather. She gave me a quick lesson on sniffers. I gathered up anything and everything that could be used to get high and took it down to my underground parking stall and locked everything in the trunk of my car.
Little did I know this was the beginning of my worst nightmare. No.2 would get behind cars that were running and sniff the exhaust fumes. He would look for gas cans on the way to school and sniff from them. When visiting friends or relatives he would go to the bathroom and get into their cleaning products. He would come out smelling like Windex, Vim, Lysol, Air Fresher etc. It did not take long for me to catch on to his shenanigans. If he had to go to the bathroom, I would go in before him and remove these items. What a pain in the butt. Everywhere we went I had to watch him like a hawk. I learned more about what can and what cannot be sniffed.
I contacted his Social Worker Nicole Meckelborg, who was never there nor did she return my calls. I called my Resource Worker, she told me to take this child to addiction services. Anyway to make a long story short, after calling, the Dept. over and over about this child and doing everything I could, Nicole and Jennifer finally came out to see me. I told them that I did not have any training in solvent abuse and I was not prepared to deal with this.
I was told by Nicole that if I did not keep this child I would be penalized and would not get any other children placed in my home.
I said, “What! You cannot do this to me.”
She said, “Yes we can.” I could not believe what I was hearing.” I looked at Jennifer and said, “This is wrong. You cannot penalize me because I am not prepared to deal with this.”
She did not say a word. Shortly thereafter they left. I sat there shaking my head. I could not believe what Nicole had said. The next day Jennifer phoned me. She told me that she had spoken to her supervisor Francine D’Aoust. She said, “Francine told her to tell me that yes, I would be penalized if I did not keep this child.” Well now I was ticked right off! I was taking my foster parent classes at the time (Yes, taking my foster parent classes after I was an approved foster home, go figure); and I was asked by Jennifer to stay after class to speak with Jacques St.Pierre, another supervisor.
Jacques started off the meeting stating, “Donna we have contacted the previous group home that No.2 lived in and they said that they had none of the problems that you are encountering with No.2.
I said, “I do not care what the group home has to say: No.2 has a sniffing problem. I have caught him sniffing, No.1 has caught him, and my friends and family can also attest to it.”
Jacques said, “You have to understand that No.2 lived in this group home for 4 years and he has been with you for less then a month. From our stand point, we have no other choice but to question your credibility.”
I could not believe what I was hearing. The Department couldn’t care less about this child. They didn’t care that he had an addiction problem. All they cared about was that they had a scapegoat. I went home shaking my head. Boy was I ever stupid. Child Protective Services was not about protecting the children. It was time for me to climb out of my ivory tower and take off my rose colored glasses. Welcome to the real world.
I went on campaign to help this child. I phoned the foster parent local association, I spoke to their support persons. I talked to older more seasoned foster parents that told me to get used to it. I called the Children’s Advocacy office. I went wild. No one could or would help me with this boy. I was so disheartened. They all kept saying write letters. So I wrote letters.
The sad part of the story is that I did it all for nothing. No one seemed to care but me. They were to busy blaming each other and worrying about who was going to be held responsible. I can’t believe how naïve I was. I really thought that it was all about saving the children. Man oh man was I wrong. Needless to say, I carried on with this boy with no help or support from the Dept. Finally I had enough and called his worker. Of course she was not there, so I left a message. To my amazement three days later she phoned me back. She asked me to take him over to a group home on the east side of the city for supper and a two hour visit. She explained to me that if all went well, he would be moved to this home the following week.
The next week Nicole Meckelborg contacted me and asked me to pack up No.2’s belongings and take him over to the group home. Unbeknownst to me at the time, I was not supposed to do that. The Social Worker is supposed to move the child or at least meet you at the new home. That was not the case. Anyway I delivered No.2 to his new home. Here I was struggling with this child and the only assistance I received was the information that I had gleaned from Heather Carter. The Social Workers and supervisors were more concerned with covering their own backs than they were with the child and my inability and lack of training to cope with him.
According to Chapter 4, policy 4.2; The Department of Social Services shall provide a range of residential services for children requiring out-of-home care to ensure that their needs may be matched to the appropriate out-of-home care residence.
Remember, I told them that I did not have any training in solvent abuse.
When you take foster parent classes they will tell you that most of the children are FASD. I remember asking Jacques St.Pierre, “When do we get training in FASD?” He said, “After you have been fostering a year.” I said, “If most of the children are FASD, why are we not being given that training now?” He said, “We have to do your foster parent training first.” I’m sorry; I don’t think it takes a rocket scientist to figure this one out. The greater percentages of these children are FASD. It only stands to reason, that we should have some training in this area, to better assist us in dealing with and understanding these children. Makes sense to me. But Jacques was right. A year later we learned all about FASD. By then all of us could have written a book on the subject!
continued on next post. > > >
1) it is not the childrens fault that they have problems
2) children need love and if you can share that love...why not?
3) Being a foster parent is very rewarding. Take for example waking up xmas morning and seeing their little eyes light up because they see someone loves them and wants to make feel safe and happy.
4) what would people like to see happen to these children, if we didnt have a foster homes. Everyone needs to feel safe and loved and wanted!!
5) why is Donna acting as though she wants to be a foster parent by attending free seminars and appreciation meals for foster parents if she indeed does not like the department.
Tell me how petty to bad mouth the department and still use them for free classes and meals??
I totally agree with you. Tell me where is Donna Jones now when this blog is being posted. Does she not want to be apart of it now or is her stories changing. I can not imagine making comments like this on an online forum and then not coming back to defend yourself. Maybe being a foster parent is for the wrong reason and you should evaluate why you chose to be a foster parent.
If I were one of the Social Workers named I would consider a law suit. Shame on the Saskatoon local and the S.F.F.A. How can you promote good working relationships with an associate member like Donna J.
Finally a few individual’s with some courage to speak out! Thank-you so much for coming forward with your concerns, I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. I was not aware that there were any new comments on this site until I checked today June 18, 2006.
I can see by your overall comments that your main concerns are my:
1)Dissatisfaction with the Department
2)Acting as though I want to be a Foster Parent
3)Attending the Seminars and The Foster Parent Honoring and Caring Banquet
4)Attending and running for a member at large at the P.A.G.M.
5)My negativity
6)My reasons for being a Foster Parent
7)The local and Provincial supporting me
8)Becoming an Associate member
My, my, I’m afraid an awful lot of assumptions have been made that have no bases in fact. I wish that all of you would take the time to make sure that you have the correct information before responding in such a negative fashion. Comments such as “I heard,” are a lazy person’s way of causing trouble and spreading vicious gossip. I urge all of you to be respectful and cautious when inferring inappropriate behavior on the part of any individual or organization.
In response to the above concerns, I will start off by saying that I loved being a Foster Parent. My reasons for becoming a Foster Parent are very personal and close to my heart. Let me assure you that my reasons are very positive and I am quite distraught that you people, assume that my reasons for Fostering were of a negative nature. I t actually saddens me to think that a person would enter into Fostering for anything other then a positive reason. In all fairness, the possibility exists that people do enter into Fostering for the wrong reasons. I would hope, as I’m sure you would that they would come to that conclusion on their own and retire from Fostering.
Why would I want to become an associate member? The answer is quite simple. I love doing things for the kids and the membership. I am very active in the fund raising for the association. I also believe that changes need to be made within the Foster care system as well as within the Department. I will not assume that you know me, for if you did you would know what a strong advocate I am for Foster Parents as well as for Foster Children. I would not have written those stories if I didn’t care, and if naming names offends you, I apologize, but I will not apologize for making those individuals accountable for their actions.
At the very time that these episodes occurred I contacted the past President of the Association. She asked me to write a letter stating my concerns so that she could take it to the provincial. I did as she asked, and as I stated in the articles; “that I wrote letter after letter to no avail.” I also asked for help from the Association and the past executive and I was not given any help. I then went to the Provincial Association on my own and finally got some answers. Not all the answers mind you, but some. I was also made aware that DCRE had no business treating me the way they had. So yes I was angry! Wouldn’t you be? Every which way I turned no one seemed able to help me. How would you feel? I was a new Foster Parent, I think anyone reading this or those articles can relate to how helpless one feels. Also anyone that has ever fostered can even better relate to the problems faced by Foster Parents and the way that Foster Parents are treated by DCRE. I believe that the individual’s that wrote their concerns have never fostered or never had a negative run in with the Department. They should attend some Foster Parent meeting’s and ask Foster Parent’s about some of the problems they face and how they have been treated. I hope that answer’s your questions in regards to why I would want to be an associate member and why I attended the PAGM and ran for a member at large position. It’s because I care…
I would also like to state once again about the importance in knowing the facts and not spreading vicious gossip that will hurt innocent people. I resent the implication that my daughter nominated me for the position on the board. I’ll have you know my daughter was not present at the PAGM! And Yes!!! A friend nominated me and another seconded my nomination! It was done according to the rules. As to the Local and the provincial supporting me, the answer is yes. Why wouldn’t they? As I said before, “They know what I believe in and what I stand for. It is apparent that you people are misinformed and attempting to create a rift between the Local Association and the Provincial Association. If this is an attempt to alienate one against the other I suggest that you come forward and state your complaints to the powers that be. If attacking me gives you personal satisfaction then so be it I have broad shoulders, but using me to assault the PAGM and Local is a cowardice way to create disharmony.
Now I shall address the matter of the Honoring and Caring Banquet. I did attend the seminar and took great pleasure in attending Ted Merriman’s lecture on Crystal Meth. I also paid for my ticket to the Honoring and Caring Banquet, and was there to celebrate some friends of mine 20 year’s plus of Fostering.
I hope that this has answered the majority of your questions. In case you are not as well informed as I think you are, I did not win the election so you can put your worries to rest. It’s funny; it was suggested to me by the past president’s husband, who was once a member on the provincial board that I run for the member at large position. It was then once again suggested to me by other members of our Local that I run, so I did. I don’t know what the big deal is. I really hope this brings some peace of mind to all of those concerned.
Whatever you do, ...don't let this little group of about 3 families steer you away from your initial purpose.
Considering that your fellow foster families in this province total close to 300, remember that they represent about 1% of your peers, ...certainly not anywhere close to the support that they attempt to portray.
No matter whether your viewpoints are valid or not, you deserve the respect to make your point without someone attacking you personally, which, unfortunately, this little clique chooses to do time after time.
You are perhaps better off ignoring them and spending your time dealing with your initial concerns. They are already heading you off into banquets, memberships, etc., this is part of their plan.
Stick with your agenda, ...not theirs
What are these groups? What do they do? Do all foster parents have access to such helpful sources, cause if so, whats the problem?
D J ,you are the main "whistle Blower"...If your support groups are funded by DCRE , isnt it naive to trust those dependant on said funding ,to truly Support you?
Have any followed your lead and picked up their whistles?
I have never met you. I applaude you for speaking your mind and having the courage to post on this blog. It is a free world and I do believe in the power of speech. In this world we live in, you can not always satisfy everyone. We are all individuals and if in some small way, you are able to help others by your stories, then I encourage you to continue. I do not know how the foster care system works, but I commend you for taking children into your home and loving them. I'm sure being a foster parent is not easy. Peace
You sound very unhappy.Is there not a grievance process? If there is, have you exhausted that avenue?
Have you talked to supervisors from Socail Services? What was their respnse? Why aren't you fostering any longer? Who represent's you? Do you have a union? Why haven't they come forward to speak on your behalf?
You ssay the "local" did not represent you properly. Why? What power do "they" have? What authority regulates them?
I will say that by naming names, that it sounds personal to me.
If you could answer these queries, further "intelligent" debate can follow.
Thank-you.
The Saskatchewan Foster Families Association. It's current Executive Director is Deb Davies. She was hired after the former Executive Director was Fired for, and is charged with, Fraud over 5000.00 dollars. Interestingly, another employee was fired for the same reason.
This organization is funded entirely by D.C.R.E. (socail services).
In just 18 months the S.F.F.A. has had 3 employees quit or be fired. It has also changed offices three times and had a review conducted on its organization by D.C.R.E.
So Donna Jones is represented by the S.F.F.A. and or D.C.R.E. Is it any wonder that she can find no satisfaction.
It seems the entire Foster care system needs an over haul, as does the S.F.F.A.
Foster parents deserve more pay, better holidays,dental plan etc. just like other people.
Fostering was volunteerism 20 years ago, but today, witth F.A.S. Drug addictions, etc. it's more of a job.
Foster parents should stand together and demand more pay and better benefits.
Aunt Gertie did have a lot to say, I think she is referring to the first message that was left talking about Donna attending free seminars and meals.
Foster Parents deserve more pay, better holidays etc etc. Well I do agree with you here to a certain point. Do you not take your foster children with you on holidays? Are they not treated as a part of your family? Why would you need better holidays?
In answer to your question,"What is an associate member?" An associate member is a person who is not a foster parent, but wishes to be involved with the foster parent association. They can attend meetings, vote,etc. They can also run for positions on the provincal association. I am actively involved in fundraising for the local. I am also a strong advocate for foster parents and foster children. Anyone in the community can become an associate member. One has to apply and state their reasons for wanting to become an associate member. It then has to go through an approval process, both local and provincial. I applied and my application was approved.
In answer to the individual that spoke about due process. You hit the nail on the head! Thanks to all your comments, the Dept has finally agreed to hear my appeal! That is part of the reason why I have gone public. The Dept. has been in violation of their own appeal process. That is part of the reason I have gone public with my story. I have taken every avenue available to me in-order to have my appeal heard. A date has not been set but I have been notified that I will be contacted soon.
An appeal must be filed, which it was on March 10, 2006. The Dept. is supposed to respond within five business days, which they did. An appeal date was set for March 31, 2006. It was cancelled by the Dept. and rescheduled for April 7, 2006. On April 6, 2006 the appeal was once again cancelled by the Dept. The Dept. was once again reminded that they were in violation of their own policies and proceedures. They did not respond.
It has now been one hundred and six days since I filed my appeal. The Provincal Association have contacted the Dept. at least once a week as well contacting Central Office in Regina. They have done everything in their power to force the Dept. to set a date.
I also contacted the Critic's office (Ted Merriman) and he has contacted the Minister on my behalf. My thanks go out to all those that have helped and supported me in my endeavors.
While fighting my own battles, I realized what it was like to not have a voice while I was a Foster Parent. The contract that we sign prohibits us from discussing what really goes on in the system. The contract protects the Dept. and empowers them to do what ever they want to us on a whim. According to the contract we have no say in the matter.
WellI have done a great deal of research into contract law. The Dept. can fire you on a whim, but under contract law they must have a good reason. You also have to be given notice and be paid severance pay. That is the law. Check it out on the web and read your contracts.
Donna Jones
Thank you, I feel silly I did not know about the associate member. One can always learn something new. Wow, if you want to step up to the plate, volunteer and be involved, then you need to be given a bouquet, I think you deserve it! You are dedicated, even though you have been drug through the mud. Keep your chin up.
I wish you luck in your appeal process. I can not imagine the stress you have been under. Please keep us up to date.
Aunt Gertie
In discussions on policy and or directives it is essential to uncover facts that will bring the truth forward.
They may be boring, long or uninteresting, but it is imperative to hear all sides of the story.
It is my experience that people who ignore facts, ignore the truth, or hide information, are idiots. Intelligence is not an entity of it's own, it is grown and nurtured by a brain, an organ occupying and sharing a body.
In hearing and discussing issues one can come to understand the problem at hand.
For the person who called us(foster parents) idiots, obviously you have starved your brain and that organ in your body is now dead. You are now a walking Zombie.
For the person who commented " foster parents are the same as people on wefare" obviously you haven't met many of them.
Injustice buster blog good job!, I will check back again.
It's too bad foster parents are afraid to talk. We know what happens when they do. Children are removed.
Mr. Bellanger, please listen to foster parents. They know what is going on. They are NOT second class citizens.
The Managers of D.C.R.E. treat them horribly. The S.F.F.A. pacifies them. Something needs to be done.
Do you take your boss on holidays. Do you take co-workers.
If you do, you're not on holidays, you're on a working retreat.... I think most people would agree that Foster families deserve a break from the Department, Workers and the foster children.
Was there not a petition asking for the resignation of the entire S.F.F.A. board? Was there not over 40 signatures on such?
That works out to be 10%. Someone needs to sharpen their pencils and redo their math.
I do not understand the minister, Mr. Bellanger, who continues to fund these organizations, and allow the same board members to make the same mistakes over and over.
The Saskatchewan Foster Families Association recieves over 400,000 dollars a year and it goes mainly to travel expenses, meals and honorariums for board members and salary for three or four staff members.
How much money goes toward services for foster families. Very little. Wow. What a waste.
There are concerned "citizens" who want our government to spend money wisely.
There are many organizations that do not control spending or spend it foolishly. Like the S.F.F.A. Why were the board members not releived of their duties after irregularities were found. This happened not once, but twice.
Citizens have the right to speak out. We have the right to know how taxpayers money is being spent.
You are not telling the truth. No one was or ever would be denied access. It was an informational petition.
It's funny that "some" people resort to lying when all else fails. Those cohorts you refer to are great people. They are still involved in the community, but not the local.
Stick to the facts. Don't lie.
I have been aware of the inhouse bickering going on within our local for quite some time. It seems there have been a number of incidents where there are a small small number of foster parents who are not happy unless they are causing trouble in one form or another. Let me tell you, I wouldn't want them as enemies. But let me repeat, it is a very very small group of people. It is for that very reason, that I chose not to be involved with our local. Please don't be afraid to move here or become a foster parent. We aren't all like that. Word soon gets around a small city like Saskatoon who the trouble makers are. It took me forever to read all this nonsense. I didn't even get a chance to read Donna Jones' story, I came right to the comments.
I encourage all foster parents to continue fostering as they have in the past. If you don't get involved, the fire can't get any bigger. This foster parent has chosen not to be involved.
Treat Thy Neighbour With Kindness
Best friends with Executive Director. They do cause a lot of trouble.
Along, with you, I know things must change. We only have different views on how this can happen. I truly feel as long as things run provincially ,funded fully by DCRE, nothing can change.
( Don't bite the hand that feeds you") is a remark made at the Nov Presidents mtg when an action plan was asked to be put in place,, all presidents were in agreement for an action plan but......."nough said?"( the action was as simple as a petition to the Minister and as serious as a moritorium on taking further placements.
Also to annonymous?! About the cohorts -I assume I am one, there was no one at the door refusing our families admission and there was one petition asking people to sign IF THEY WERE UNHAPPY WITH THIS PROVINCIAL ASSOC, also one paper where I requested respite, if anyone was availlable to please sign, the last paper was to please sign your name and # if
you could possibly volunteer in the future.
I enjoy this blog, if nothing else comes of it you have open the lines to discussion.
Fostering is as rewarding as it is frustrating. If anyone out there is feeling they could open their hearts and homes to kids in need it is a privelege to make a meaningful difference.
Enter this work with caution, do not be afraid to say no to any placement and know your limitations.
Ask questions and get support from experienced foster parents.
The vast majority of foster parents are respectable, caring compassionate people and don't fit into that "lazy stupid welfare recipient " mould!!!!
My wish would be that all of us had what we need to become Happy ,Healthy, functional parents, and in turn we would help to ensure kids in our care be happy, healthy and functional.
Social workers can also be more healthy, happy and functional if they would receive what they need---Clerical and accounting staff, case aids --then they could do the job they signed up for--SOCIAL WORK !Good Luck! Jackie Sorowski
You did an outstanding job as President. Too bad The S.F.F.A. and it's Executive Director didn't like or support you. How can we Foster Parents keep volunteers when they are persecuted by the sffa and its new executive director.
Kudos to you and other volunteers who try to help Foster parents but are harrassed and defeated by them.
To the woman who said,"I was denied access...." Why would you LIE like this. You obviously have no class or integrity.
I was at that x-mas party and no such thing ever occurred.
I think I know who you are and I'm disgraced to call you a fellow foster parent.
For all the D.C.R.E. workers and foster parents who know my wife, I'm sure they would agree, that she did not deserve what she got.
I would challenge any person to come forward and tell me, us foster parents, what she did that hurt or offended any one.
Jackie has respect for other people, treats them kindly, knowing it is, at times, not reciprocated. If this is a "CO-HORT then I am proud to be a so called co-hort.
Treating people with dignity and respect, being truthful and having personal integrity are valuable assets and I think we lost a good president and representative.
Vince Sorowski
On behalf of all Foster parents who choose not to participate in sewing circles, end this blog now before more baseless accusations are made by "ANONYMOUS"!
When I first married into a Foster Family it was bizarre. I thought, “how can these people love and care for other (often) messed up people’s children?”. It truly boggled (and still does) my mind that you’d get paid a 7-11 wage to be a babysitter, psychologist, Dr., teacher, grandma/grandpa, and all around mentor to these kids. I mean, at least people that work at 7-11 get Christmas off!!!!!!!!
What it boils down to is that this is a job. A very tough and time consuming but rewarding job that only few people in this world are capable of dedicating their lives to. You’re obviously not in it for the pay so what are you doing it for? You love the kids and take pride in seeing some of them go home, graduate high school, and grow up and whether they work at Sarcan, become teachers, work at 7-11, or take on Foster Kids of their own some day YOU were a part of that.
If your job becomes all about the politics and the hatred/distrust/anger consumes you then why not either band together to change it or quit. I understand that it’s a huge battle but just like any ‘job’ if you don’t like something then work to amend it.
If I told every co-worker what I thought about them and why I didn’t like what they were doing I’d be out of a job or else sitting in the hall eating my lunch by myself.
Wouldn’t it make more sense (again…third party here!) to band together to receive better pay, less crowded homes, and more assistance all around than to attempt to beat The National Enquirer circulation?
May I also contradict myself for one moment by saying that I was at that said Christmas party and all I saw was my husband (who won’t even dance with me) spinning around the floor with ridiculously happy Foster Kids and a Santa who I dearly loved letting 50+ kids tell them what they wanted while the parents had a good time watching the kids have a good time.
I may not always be the best ‘married into the family and now I have 3 sometimes 10 foster siblings-in-law’ but my mom and dad-in-law and people like yourselves have made a person who can’t even stand the neighbors dog for 5 minutes, love kids that I’d normally not look twice at. I admire your profession (but am not up for recruitment at anytime!) and urge you to move forward to make it a better ‘work environment’.
Different Christmas party but the same idea! My husband does like to spin and dance though.
I think it's common practise for the board and Executive Director to tell people who to vote for.
Corrupt, Corrupt, Corrupt. The Executive Director does not want any one from Saskatoon to win because nearly everyone knows her and her ways.
The present Government should be ashamed of themselves for the way thgey treat Foster parents.
i just read all these letters.. very interesting.. i smiled over the one regarding f.p. being welfare recipients.. if we were, we could have had dental, optical and prescription coverage...
we are doing a job that is beating us.. the thing is without us where do the kids go and whose responsibility would it be?
we do love our kids..
I think it's common practise for the board and Executive Director to tell people who to vote for.
Corrupt, Corrupt, Corrupt. The Executive Director does not want any one from Saskatoon to win because nearly everyone knows her and her ways."
Hold the phone here. This is the problem of this thread filled with accusations that are unfounded. Your comments about being told who to vote for contradicts the fact that it was a secret ballot complete with scrutineers from each delegate. What gets put down on the ballot is indicative of the true wishes of the voters present at the Annual General Meeting. Everything else is simply hearsay and repeated here as "truth". If you were there, did you have someone standing over your shoulder peering down at your ballot telling you what to check off? Did you hand your ballot to someone to put it in the box for you?
If the elections were not fair, why didn't someone call foul at the meeting? We don't live in a country where armed guerillas point assualt rifles at you while you vote. Your perception that it wasn't a fair election based upon hearsay that people were told who to vote for or not vote for(Although I never heard those comments while at the AGM from anyone, and I spoke with many, many delegate)in itself indicates you have a problem with our political system today. During the Federal elections, I recived calls from campaign workers telling me why I shouldn't vote for so and so. Are the Federal elections now declared unfair? When I cast each of my ballots, I did so for the canidates that I knew and who I believe will represent us. I was a little dismayed that it was a one horse race for President, but having said that, I would have voted for him anyway. I feel you should share these comments with the President and the board, and see how they feel that you felt the elections were "corrupt, corrupt, corrupt". Then, please change the democratically elected board (by you remember)by running in the next election and campaign. Oh, and in order to campaign, you need to tell people why you would better serve the SFFA than the next guy (but you can't I guess, because that would be telling people how to vote....hmmm...what a conflict).
I heard a phrse used at a local meeting in Saskatoon,about how we stay so quiet about problems and it was emotional blackmail, thats what sums it up for me, I dont want to get to involved cause of my kids but I know theres bad stuff going on.
Whatever someone writes in, whether it's about holiday's or better pay or vote rigging YOU are there to dispute it. The department and the S.F.F.A. have a good friend. Someone who doesn't want better pay. Someone who doesn't want respite or holidays even though the Department requests Foster Parents take their five day respite in a block. Someone who believes the S.F.F.A. and the department. How can you defend Donna when you believe the Department is doing all the right things;
Perhaps you're not a Foster parent but an employee. I just can't believe a foster parent thinks the Department and the S.F.F.A. are wonderful institutions.
Its about morality and respect. Did the Department treat Donna with respect. NO. That's how they treat a lot of foster parent's.
I'm glad you are so happy with everything. It just so happens that there are some of us who are not.
We will continue to voice our concerns. Oh, if you want to come forward I would be happy to supply you with a list of disgruntled Foster parents and the names of the people who witnessed first hand vote rigging.
I think staff of the sffa and board members should not be allowed to lobby for who they want on the board.
Most people who run for positions do not have the resources to travel and explain their position.
So if someone on the board doesn't like him/her they simply tell everyone that that person is not a good choice.
It does happen. Vote-rigging may be the wrong choice of words. Friendly persausion may be a better term.
JoJo
http://robtshepherd.tripod.com/wenatchee.html
Paul Craig Roberts
Washington Times (DC)
Two decades ago hysterical liberals created a monster, an unaccountable Gestapo known today as Child Protective Services. Crazed therapists testified before Congress that 75 percent of parents were child abusers and that a new national bureaucracy was necessary to protect children. Congress obliged the therapists' request and unleashed a Frankenstein.
Several years ago the local CPS in Wenatchee, Washington, got the word from the state office to find some cases to justify its budget. Thus began a modern day Salem Witch Hunt that resulted in the arrest of 43 adults on 30,000 counts of sex abuse against 60 children.
It was all a fabrication to justify a budget.
Many of the accused were poor and uneducated. When a local pastor, Robert Roberson, came to their aid, he and his wife were arrested on child sex abuse charges and held on million dollar bonds. Part of Pastor Roberson's lesson from the corrupt police was jail beatings.
When Roberson's case went to trial, the falsity of the charges against him were obvious. The Witch Hunt had overreached. Roberson was acquitted, and this was a turning point.
Another turning point was Juana Vasquez, the director of Child Welfare Services in Wenatchee who challenged the charges brought against Robert Devereaux, a kindly man who operated a foster home for children. Her integrity got her fired.
This was another mistake by the witch hunters drunk with their power. Mrs. Vasquez was a woman of steel. The daughter of migrant farm workers who worked her way through college and became dean of admissions at Gonzaga University, she could not be intimidated.
She took a stand against the injustice and beat the authorities in a law suit that awarded her $1.57 million.
One outcome is that the City of Wenatchee has paid Mr. Devereaux $209,000 to drop his suit for malicious prosecution and wrongful arrest.
Pastor Roberson, Mrs. Vasquez and a few others had the courage to stand up to evil and expose the witch hunt. The state Court of Appeals has overturned six cases, handing down rulings highly critical of the police, trial judges, prosecutors and public defenders.
Eleven people remain wrongfully imprisoned awaiting their appeals.
Mrs. Vasquez died on April 29 of brain cancer. She was 48 years old and is survived by eight children and her husband. Mrs. Vasquez and one county commissioner were the only public officials with the courage to challenge the witch hunt. The local newspaper and radio station and the local elites all went along with the false charges.
"I wish I had more time to see this through, to see those from Wenatchee, the innocent people wrongly imprisoned, freed from their cells," were among Mrs. Vasquez's last words. "There are others who have a responsibility to do something, but who stand silent. Our governor still turns his head.
"Janet Reno looks the other way. The legislature does a little, but not enough. Wenatchee can happen again in this state unless the citizens and the government voice their outrage."
Pastor Roberson, Mrs. Vasquez and a brave few helped to end the deafening silence. A Spokane TV station took up the investigation and helped to expose the witch hunt. Then the Seattle Post-Intelligencer turned loose two investigative reporters.
The facts are now in. Public authorities in the state of Washington framed numerous people on false charges and put their children out for adoption. Prosecutors brought the false cases to trial or to plea bargains. Trial judges looked the other way, playing see no evil, hear no evil.
When the sordid witch hunt was exposed, the state responded by appointing commissions. All of the public authorities who framed innocent people remain at large. No indictments have been brought against those responsible for one of the greatest abuses of public power in our history.
And we are supposed to trust government?
-----------------------------
Gerry Duffett
14-4218 Lawrence Ave E Box 218
Scarborough Ontario
Canada M1E4X9
gerryduffett47@yahoo.com
gerryduffett@fastmail.ca
Pager # 416-612-5689
http://gerryduffett.proboards54.com/index.cgi?board=general
Links to this post:
Post a Comment
return to injusticebustersblog main page


