.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Sunday, May 07, 2006

 

Everything you ever wanted to know about fostering children and what the Department of Community Resources and Employment does not want you to know.


Donna Jones, originally uploaded by Sheila Steele.




The following account by Donna Jones begins a series of her accounts of Kafka-esque experiences she had from the time she was approved as a foster parent until all her foster children were illegally removed from her and she brought her story to injusticebusters.



Foster son number 1

My first foster son came to live with me in July 2004 when he was 14 years old. One evening we were driving down Circle Drive east. As I approached College Drive the amber lights were flashing. I reduced my speed from 90 kilometers to 60 kilometers. My foster son reached over and pushed the gear shift into park. We were lucky that there was no traffic at the time and that we were not involved in a serious accident. I have since had trouble with my transmission. My mechanic has advised putting in a new one.

I told Kendra Smith, his Social Worker, about the incident. She asked if we were alright. I said, “Yes” and that was the end of it. She did not enquire whether there was any damage to my car or suggest that I get the car checked.

Remember, I was a new foster parent, I did not know that the Dept. is responsible for damages caused by a foster child. Nor did the Social Worker inform me of this policy.
Chapter 8, policy 8.6 states; Where a foster family’s personal insurance or SFFA rider did not cover the cost for damages caused by children in care, the department may pay compensation. Such compensation may be provided for: deductibles, increased premiums, actual loss.
Amount: Actual amount supported by receipts or an amount based on estimates signed by an insurance adjuster or licensed contractor/dealer. Claims must be for repair or replacement to an equal or lesser value of the damaged item.

Imagine that, I could have got my car repaired but no one told me.

Thanks for sharing Kendra.

Foster son number 2

My second foster son came to me in August, 2004. He was also 14 years of age. While I was at work one day, he decided to put a fork in the microwave. He then went to the bathroom to do his business. Well lo and behold the micro wave caught on fire. I asked him why he would do such a thing.

He said, “I wanted to see if you would get mad.”

“Mad!” I said, “Why would I get mad? The microwave caught on fire, the kitchen could have caught on fire, we live in an apartment building and it could have caught on fire.” I said, “No I think mad is too mild a term for what I am feeling.”

His Social Worker, Nicole Meckelborg, and my Resource Worker, Jennifer Frank were present when I discovered the microwave. They did not say a word. Did either one of them offer to replace my micro wave? No!

Two days later I went to use the microwave and realized that I no longer had one and I started fuming. I called his Social Worker, Nicole Meckelborg and as usual she was not around. Nor was she in the habit of returning phone calls, (which you had better get used to if you want to be a foster parent). I then called my Resource Worker Jennifer Frank. She was not available either, but Jennifer did return my call. I told her, I was not a millionaire and I could not afford a new micro wave. I wanted something done about this and I wanted something done about it now! She said she would see what she could do and would call me back. Half an hour later she phoned me back. She told me that there would be a store voucher at the front desk after two o’clock which I could pick up. I thanked her and picked up my voucher and purchased a new micro wave.

Foster son No.2 had some very serious problems. He was a sniffer. I was at work one morning when foster son No.1’s probation officer came for a visit. Her name was Heather Carter. Foster son No.2 had just gone out. No.1 had just got out of the shower prior to the Heather’s arrival. Heather smelled a strong scent of ammonia. She asked, No.1 if he was sniffing. He said, “No, I just got out of the shower. I have a new foster brother and he just left. I think he is sniffing.”

Heather stayed and watched No.1 very closely for a little while. She determined that No.1 was not high and told No.1 to have me call her. I arrived ten minutes after she left. I called her immediately. She informed me of her findings. I was freaked right out. I had never dealt with anything like this in my life. I did not have a clue what to do or what to watch for! Thank heavens for Heather. She gave me a quick lesson on sniffers. I gathered up anything and everything that could be used to get high and took it down to my underground parking stall and locked everything in the trunk of my car.

Little did I know this was the beginning of my worst nightmare. No.2 would get behind cars that were running and sniff the exhaust fumes. He would look for gas cans on the way to school and sniff from them. When visiting friends or relatives he would go to the bathroom and get into their cleaning products. He would come out smelling like Windex, Vim, Lysol, Air Fresher etc. It did not take long for me to catch on to his shenanigans. If he had to go to the bathroom, I would go in before him and remove these items. What a pain in the butt. Everywhere we went I had to watch him like a hawk. I learned more about what can and what cannot be sniffed.

I contacted his Social Worker Nicole Meckelborg, who was never there nor did she return my calls. I called my Resource Worker, she told me to take this child to addiction services. Anyway to make a long story short, after calling, the Dept. over and over about this child and doing everything I could, Nicole and Jennifer finally came out to see me. I told them that I did not have any training in solvent abuse and I was not prepared to deal with this.

I was told by Nicole that if I did not keep this child I would be penalized and would not get any other children placed in my home.

I said, “What! You cannot do this to me.”

She said, “Yes we can.” I could not believe what I was hearing.” I looked at Jennifer and said, “This is wrong. You cannot penalize me because I am not prepared to deal with this.”

She did not say a word. Shortly thereafter they left. I sat there shaking my head. I could not believe what Nicole had said. The next day Jennifer phoned me. She told me that she had spoken to her supervisor Francine D’Aoust. She said, “Francine told her to tell me that yes, I would be penalized if I did not keep this child.” Well now I was ticked right off! I was taking my foster parent classes at the time (Yes, taking my foster parent classes after I was an approved foster home, go figure); and I was asked by Jennifer to stay after class to speak with Jacques St.Pierre, another supervisor.

Jacques started off the meeting stating, “Donna we have contacted the previous group home that No.2 lived in and they said that they had none of the problems that you are encountering with No.2.

I said, “I do not care what the group home has to say: No.2 has a sniffing problem. I have caught him sniffing, No.1 has caught him, and my friends and family can also attest to it.”

Jacques said, “You have to understand that No.2 lived in this group home for 4 years and he has been with you for less then a month. From our stand point, we have no other choice but to question your credibility.”

I could not believe what I was hearing. The Department couldn’t care less about this child. They didn’t care that he had an addiction problem. All they cared about was that they had a scapegoat. I went home shaking my head. Boy was I ever stupid. Child Protective Services was not about protecting the children. It was time for me to climb out of my ivory tower and take off my rose colored glasses. Welcome to the real world.

I went on campaign to help this child. I phoned the foster parent local association, I spoke to their support persons. I talked to older more seasoned foster parents that told me to get used to it. I called the Children’s Advocacy office. I went wild. No one could or would help me with this boy. I was so disheartened. They all kept saying write letters. So I wrote letters.

The sad part of the story is that I did it all for nothing. No one seemed to care but me. They were to busy blaming each other and worrying about who was going to be held responsible. I can’t believe how naïve I was. I really thought that it was all about saving the children. Man oh man was I wrong. Needless to say, I carried on with this boy with no help or support from the Dept. Finally I had enough and called his worker. Of course she was not there, so I left a message. To my amazement three days later she phoned me back. She asked me to take him over to a group home on the east side of the city for supper and a two hour visit. She explained to me that if all went well, he would be moved to this home the following week.

The next week Nicole Meckelborg contacted me and asked me to pack up No.2’s belongings and take him over to the group home. Unbeknownst to me at the time, I was not supposed to do that. The Social Worker is supposed to move the child or at least meet you at the new home. That was not the case. Anyway I delivered No.2 to his new home. Here I was struggling with this child and the only assistance I received was the information that I had gleaned from Heather Carter. The Social Workers and supervisors were more concerned with covering their own backs than they were with the child and my inability and lack of training to cope with him.

According to Chapter 4, policy 4.2; The Department of Social Services shall provide a range of residential services for children requiring out-of-home care to ensure that their needs may be matched to the appropriate out-of-home care residence.

Remember, I told them that I did not have any training in solvent abuse.

When you take foster parent classes they will tell you that most of the children are FASD. I remember asking Jacques St.Pierre, “When do we get training in FASD?” He said, “After you have been fostering a year.” I said, “If most of the children are FASD, why are we not being given that training now?” He said, “We have to do your foster parent training first.” I’m sorry; I don’t think it takes a rocket scientist to figure this one out. The greater percentages of these children are FASD. It only stands to reason, that we should have some training in this area, to better assist us in dealing with and understanding these children. Makes sense to me. But Jacques was right. A year later we learned all about FASD. By then all of us could have written a book on the subject!

continued on next post. > > >


Comments:
no.1 and no.2 appear to be a commercial for Abortion on demand why would anyone want to be a Foster parent?
 

Why be a foster parent?
1) it is not the childrens fault that they have problems

2) children need love and if you can share that love...why not?

3) Being a foster parent is very rewarding. Take for example waking up xmas morning and seeing their little eyes light up because they see someone loves them and wants to make feel safe and happy.

4) what would people like to see happen to these children, if we didnt have a foster homes. Everyone needs to feel safe and loved and wanted!!

5) why is Donna acting as though she wants to be a foster parent by attending free seminars and appreciation meals for foster parents if she indeed does not like the department.

Tell me how petty to bad mouth the department and still use them for free classes and meals??
 

Saskatchewan Foster Families Assoc. is funded and supported by DCRE--After being treated so poorly why would anyone want to be made an associate member by its provincial board? Donna Jones are you now an assoc member? A one sided Airing of differences is unfair as proffesional people cannot or will not make comment on the "ILLEGAL" removal of the kids?!
 

Donna...This was your first Foster Child, by your own words a new Foster Parent. READ policy chapter 8 8.6. Only homes fully approved as Foster homes are members of the Saskatchewan Foster Families Association and eligible for coverage under the "rider". As for the rest of your "story" perhaps you should listen to the way you speak to the people you work with.
 

anonymous...

I totally agree with you. Tell me where is Donna Jones now when this blog is being posted. Does she not want to be apart of it now or is her stories changing. I can not imagine making comments like this on an online forum and then not coming back to defend yourself. Maybe being a foster parent is for the wrong reason and you should evaluate why you chose to be a foster parent.
 

I hear Donna Jone's was nominated to run as a member at large at P.A.G.M. Is our local supporting this person and her negativity. Does the S.F.F.A. and our local think this is the type of person to make an associate member.
If I were one of the Social Workers named I would consider a law suit. Shame on the Saskatoon local and the S.F.F.A. How can you promote good working relationships with an associate member like Donna J.
 

I too heard that she had been nominated but by her daughter and a friend. I hope our local committee does not support this kind of negativity and I hope that the workers names that were involved do not take affence to one sided comments from Donna J.
 

To all those that commented Anonymously,
Finally a few individual’s with some courage to speak out! Thank-you so much for coming forward with your concerns, I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. I was not aware that there were any new comments on this site until I checked today June 18, 2006.

I can see by your overall comments that your main concerns are my:

1)Dissatisfaction with the Department

2)Acting as though I want to be a Foster Parent

3)Attending the Seminars and The Foster Parent Honoring and Caring Banquet

4)Attending and running for a member at large at the P.A.G.M.

5)My negativity

6)My reasons for being a Foster Parent

7)The local and Provincial supporting me

8)Becoming an Associate member

My, my, I’m afraid an awful lot of assumptions have been made that have no bases in fact. I wish that all of you would take the time to make sure that you have the correct information before responding in such a negative fashion. Comments such as “I heard,” are a lazy person’s way of causing trouble and spreading vicious gossip. I urge all of you to be respectful and cautious when inferring inappropriate behavior on the part of any individual or organization.

In response to the above concerns, I will start off by saying that I loved being a Foster Parent. My reasons for becoming a Foster Parent are very personal and close to my heart. Let me assure you that my reasons are very positive and I am quite distraught that you people, assume that my reasons for Fostering were of a negative nature. I t actually saddens me to think that a person would enter into Fostering for anything other then a positive reason. In all fairness, the possibility exists that people do enter into Fostering for the wrong reasons. I would hope, as I’m sure you would that they would come to that conclusion on their own and retire from Fostering.

Why would I want to become an associate member? The answer is quite simple. I love doing things for the kids and the membership. I am very active in the fund raising for the association. I also believe that changes need to be made within the Foster care system as well as within the Department. I will not assume that you know me, for if you did you would know what a strong advocate I am for Foster Parents as well as for Foster Children. I would not have written those stories if I didn’t care, and if naming names offends you, I apologize, but I will not apologize for making those individuals accountable for their actions.

At the very time that these episodes occurred I contacted the past President of the Association. She asked me to write a letter stating my concerns so that she could take it to the provincial. I did as she asked, and as I stated in the articles; “that I wrote letter after letter to no avail.” I also asked for help from the Association and the past executive and I was not given any help. I then went to the Provincial Association on my own and finally got some answers. Not all the answers mind you, but some. I was also made aware that DCRE had no business treating me the way they had. So yes I was angry! Wouldn’t you be? Every which way I turned no one seemed able to help me. How would you feel? I was a new Foster Parent, I think anyone reading this or those articles can relate to how helpless one feels. Also anyone that has ever fostered can even better relate to the problems faced by Foster Parents and the way that Foster Parents are treated by DCRE. I believe that the individual’s that wrote their concerns have never fostered or never had a negative run in with the Department. They should attend some Foster Parent meeting’s and ask Foster Parent’s about some of the problems they face and how they have been treated. I hope that answer’s your questions in regards to why I would want to be an associate member and why I attended the PAGM and ran for a member at large position. It’s because I care…

I would also like to state once again about the importance in knowing the facts and not spreading vicious gossip that will hurt innocent people. I resent the implication that my daughter nominated me for the position on the board. I’ll have you know my daughter was not present at the PAGM! And Yes!!! A friend nominated me and another seconded my nomination! It was done according to the rules. As to the Local and the provincial supporting me, the answer is yes. Why wouldn’t they? As I said before, “They know what I believe in and what I stand for. It is apparent that you people are misinformed and attempting to create a rift between the Local Association and the Provincial Association. If this is an attempt to alienate one against the other I suggest that you come forward and state your complaints to the powers that be. If attacking me gives you personal satisfaction then so be it I have broad shoulders, but using me to assault the PAGM and Local is a cowardice way to create disharmony.

Now I shall address the matter of the Honoring and Caring Banquet. I did attend the seminar and took great pleasure in attending Ted Merriman’s lecture on Crystal Meth. I also paid for my ticket to the Honoring and Caring Banquet, and was there to celebrate some friends of mine 20 year’s plus of Fostering.

I hope that this has answered the majority of your questions. In case you are not as well informed as I think you are, I did not win the election so you can put your worries to rest. It’s funny; it was suggested to me by the past president’s husband, who was once a member on the provincial board that I run for the member at large position. It was then once again suggested to me by other members of our Local that I run, so I did. I don’t know what the big deal is. I really hope this brings some peace of mind to all of those concerned.
 

It is interseting that Ms. Jones is in support of an organization (sask. foster families asso.) where the executive director past is now facing charges of fraud over 5 thousand. The same people with the exception of a few are still on that executive. More than one signature was needed to cash those checks. Changes need to be made??? You bet...and its not just the department of social services that needs to make them.
 

Donna...You have the ADACITY to urge people to be respectful and cautious when inferrering inappropriate behavior on the part of any individual or organization???ENOUGH SAID....Take your own advice!
 

Donna Jones
Whatever you do, ...don't let this little group of about 3 families steer you away from your initial purpose.
Considering that your fellow foster families in this province total close to 300, remember that they represent about 1% of your peers, ...certainly not anywhere close to the support that they attempt to portray.
No matter whether your viewpoints are valid or not, you deserve the respect to make your point without someone attacking you personally, which, unfortunately, this little clique chooses to do time after time.
You are perhaps better off ignoring them and spending your time dealing with your initial concerns. They are already heading you off into banquets, memberships, etc., this is part of their plan.
Stick with your agenda, ...not theirs
 

Donna Jones ;you say the local and provincial supported you! Have things been remedied then?
What are these groups? What do they do? Do all foster parents have access to such helpful sources, cause if so, whats the problem?
D J ,you are the main "whistle Blower"...If your support groups are funded by DCRE , isnt it naive to trust those dependant on said funding ,to truly Support you?
Have any followed your lead and picked up their whistles?
 

If you do not mind, name the names of the 1%.I would like to get in touch with one of them as we are like minded.Thank-you
 

I somehow get the feeling that this is a personal feud. Anonymous, don't air your dirty laundry on blog. It seems that there is a lot of junk coming in here. Just read Donna Jones' story and some of the comments have nothing to do with her story. This tells me it is PERSONAL CRAP. It's her story and I quite liked reading it, although it is very sad and I feel for her. Obviously if Social Services approved her, then she can't be all that bad. The anonymous comments suggest that these are other foster parents, now why are they so worried about her business. I know someone who is a foster parent and I do know it is not easy, I have seen what she goes through. Some of the behaviours are out of this world but she keeps trucking on because she loves what she does and it shows. Social Services should be slapped on the wrist for treating one of their foster parents like this.
 

Donna Jones,

I have never met you. I applaude you for speaking your mind and having the courage to post on this blog. It is a free world and I do believe in the power of speech. In this world we live in, you can not always satisfy everyone. We are all individuals and if in some small way, you are able to help others by your stories, then I encourage you to continue. I do not know how the foster care system works, but I commend you for taking children into your home and loving them. I'm sure being a foster parent is not easy. Peace
 

I am not a fosterparent, and have been following this Blog, and I have made comments. THIS IS A PUBLIC BLOG, everyones comments count. If Donna Jones did not want negative comments, she would not have commented herself publicly. I have no connection to this situation, so please don't assume you know who is commenting on this Blog. Free speech!!!
 

Don't air your dirty laundry on a blog..PLEASE..what do you think a blog is? Donna Jones aired her dirty laundry..I assume she expected negative and positive comments, she probably welcomed them. If you are not familiar with an honest, intelligent dabate, I suggest you stick with reality T.V and leave the debate to those that can emotionally and intellectually handle it.
 

It would seem that there are some ruffled feathers!!! That is fine, you as I am, Not associated with nor do I even know Donna Jones, nor am I a foster parent or even care to be one. I do think I have the right to speak my mind also, and I am only commenting on what I had observed. It does seem that a lot of these comments are people who personally know her and when I read quotes of policies and talking about P.A.G.M. and being nominated to run for member at large just to name a few as I scroll down to have a peek, this makes me think these people are foster parents. I am not saying I agree with everything that she wrote, but it's her story, and yes one would expect to get negative comments and yes that is free speech but on the other hand, I think this lady has her own right to free speech, after all do we not live in a democratic society where we can boast of free speech
 

I wouldn't call these comments a debate...in fact I wouldn't call them intelligent either...I think I've just p**%ed you off because I hit the nail on the head.
 

Foster Parents fighting Foster Parents. What a great Organization. Who runs this gong show.
 

Donna J.
You sound very unhappy.Is there not a grievance process? If there is, have you exhausted that avenue?
Have you talked to supervisors from Socail Services? What was their respnse? Why aren't you fostering any longer? Who represent's you? Do you have a union? Why haven't they come forward to speak on your behalf?
You ssay the "local" did not represent you properly. Why? What power do "they" have? What authority regulates them?
I will say that by naming names, that it sounds personal to me.
If you could answer these queries, further "intelligent" debate can follow.
Thank-you.
 

Very interesting! I am a foster parent and yes I know there are stories out there like the ones Donna Jones tells. I don't doubt for a minute that what she says is the truth. My heart aches for her. I can not imagine going through what she has had to endure. When someone is deep in the middle of a crisis, it is hard to separate and take a step back and take another look at the situation from a different angle. Emotions run high and sometimes things are said out of frustration. Donna, we have never met, actually, I had never heard of you until I heard via the grape vine about this blog. The emphasis was given on the anonymous comments rather than your story. I feel a need to apologize for the harsh words you have received. It is so sad that DCRE lost a foster home, with all the children in need of homes. I would think that most foster homes would not think ill of you for speaking up, rather, they would commend you. Myself personally, have never, run into the problems you have had, but I do know they exsist. There are so many good stories out there, and I ask that some foster families write to this blog and share their stories. I will start by saying: this summer my husband will be walking down the aisle with one of our first foster children, giving her hand in marriage. We are so proud of who she has become. We have so many stories as we have been fostering for many years. I will not lie, sometimes it hasn't been easy, but for the most part, it has been very rewarding. We have to stand up for the rights of our children as well as the rights of ourselves. Donna Jones, please keep well. God Bless.
 

Nasty Nasty Nasty.....shouldn't you guys be volunteering at canadian tire bbq's rather than attacking donna?? Funny there hasn't been a lawsuit filed by DCRE(not like they can't afford it)may be they havent because she speaks the truth???May be your efforts would be best spent caring for your own foster kids before you become a statistic like donna.
 

Well finally someone with a positive attitude. Thank you, Thank you. What is an associate member foster parent? Why would it be a bad thing for someone to want to attend a free seminar. I would only see this as a positive aspect. I know I would attend a free seminar if it meant I would be learning something of interest to me and it could help me in my job or in my personal life and I didn't have to pay for it. I would say good for Donna Jones if she can find a seminar that is free. Definitely a good thing! That's money in her pocket. I say take advantage of some free education because it doesn't happen every day! I do find that usually when someone makes waves over something so trivial, they are usually jealous. Jealousy doesn't get you anywhere in this ol' world. Aunt Gertie says so!
 

Donna J you should write a book. How does someone foster a child with those types of behaviours...scary. I hope they paid you a high salary.
 

In response to the Question, who runs this organization:
The Saskatchewan Foster Families Association. It's current Executive Director is Deb Davies. She was hired after the former Executive Director was Fired for, and is charged with, Fraud over 5000.00 dollars. Interestingly, another employee was fired for the same reason.
This organization is funded entirely by D.C.R.E. (socail services).
In just 18 months the S.F.F.A. has had 3 employees quit or be fired. It has also changed offices three times and had a review conducted on its organization by D.C.R.E.
So Donna Jones is represented by the S.F.F.A. and or D.C.R.E. Is it any wonder that she can find no satisfaction.
 

What does canadian tire barbecues or aunt gertie have to do with intelligent debate.
It seems the entire Foster care system needs an over haul, as does the S.F.F.A.
Foster parents deserve more pay, better holidays,dental plan etc. just like other people.
Fostering was volunteerism 20 years ago, but today, witth F.A.S. Drug addictions, etc. it's more of a job.
Foster parents should stand together and demand more pay and better benefits.
 

So we have some intelligent debate going on here!? To the person who wrote "what does canadian tire bbqs and aunt gertie have to do with intelligent debate"....well I think it has a lot to do with it. This "intelligent" person figured it out. Maybe you should go back and read those messages again. Personal attacks don't prove anything, just that the person throwing them have no character.

Aunt Gertie did have a lot to say, I think she is referring to the first message that was left talking about Donna attending free seminars and meals.

Foster Parents deserve more pay, better holidays etc etc. Well I do agree with you here to a certain point. Do you not take your foster children with you on holidays? Are they not treated as a part of your family? Why would you need better holidays?
 

I have been reading this blog off and on for a couple of weeks...I just want to say "YOU ARE ALL A BUNCH OF IDIOTS" Listen to yourselves!! Who cares what Donna Writes,who cares about the policy 8, who cares who got fired and who cares who got charged with fraud...you guys need to get together and fix whats wrong!!all of you..together...please
 

This entire discussion has gone from ridiculous to absurd...and as much as I love this blog, I am becoming quite bored with all the accusations and bullshit from both sides...every one...grow up and start working together to start solving some of these problems...you all need to start sticking together to work things out...
 

Any Foster Parent I have ever met is only a step above...maybe... of someone on welfare, so why don't you get a real job..all of you.... and quit bitching about what you don't get...and who says what..get over it and get real lives...
 

This blog is so ridiculous and if I were Donna Jones, I wouldn't even give these "anonymous" people the time of day and answer any of there comments. Crazy crazy people. Everyone take your additudes somewhere else. I know I won't be back.
 

I kind of like what Aunt Gertie had to say.

In answer to your question,"What is an associate member?" An associate member is a person who is not a foster parent, but wishes to be involved with the foster parent association. They can attend meetings, vote,etc. They can also run for positions on the provincal association. I am actively involved in fundraising for the local. I am also a strong advocate for foster parents and foster children. Anyone in the community can become an associate member. One has to apply and state their reasons for wanting to become an associate member. It then has to go through an approval process, both local and provincial. I applied and my application was approved.

In answer to the individual that spoke about due process. You hit the nail on the head! Thanks to all your comments, the Dept has finally agreed to hear my appeal! That is part of the reason why I have gone public. The Dept. has been in violation of their own appeal process. That is part of the reason I have gone public with my story. I have taken every avenue available to me in-order to have my appeal heard. A date has not been set but I have been notified that I will be contacted soon.

An appeal must be filed, which it was on March 10, 2006. The Dept. is supposed to respond within five business days, which they did. An appeal date was set for March 31, 2006. It was cancelled by the Dept. and rescheduled for April 7, 2006. On April 6, 2006 the appeal was once again cancelled by the Dept. The Dept. was once again reminded that they were in violation of their own policies and proceedures. They did not respond.

It has now been one hundred and six days since I filed my appeal. The Provincal Association have contacted the Dept. at least once a week as well contacting Central Office in Regina. They have done everything in their power to force the Dept. to set a date.

I also contacted the Critic's office (Ted Merriman) and he has contacted the Minister on my behalf. My thanks go out to all those that have helped and supported me in my endeavors.

While fighting my own battles, I realized what it was like to not have a voice while I was a Foster Parent. The contract that we sign prohibits us from discussing what really goes on in the system. The contract protects the Dept. and empowers them to do what ever they want to us on a whim. According to the contract we have no say in the matter.

WellI have done a great deal of research into contract law. The Dept. can fire you on a whim, but under contract law they must have a good reason. You also have to be given notice and be paid severance pay. That is the law. Check it out on the web and read your contracts.
Donna Jones
 

Donna Jones,

Thank you, I feel silly I did not know about the associate member. One can always learn something new. Wow, if you want to step up to the plate, volunteer and be involved, then you need to be given a bouquet, I think you deserve it! You are dedicated, even though you have been drug through the mud. Keep your chin up.

I wish you luck in your appeal process. I can not imagine the stress you have been under. Please keep us up to date.

Aunt Gertie
 

By having a debate, by sharing information on corrupt people or organizations, the public will eventually hear the truth.
In discussions on policy and or directives it is essential to uncover facts that will bring the truth forward.
They may be boring, long or uninteresting, but it is imperative to hear all sides of the story.
It is my experience that people who ignore facts, ignore the truth, or hide information, are idiots. Intelligence is not an entity of it's own, it is grown and nurtured by a brain, an organ occupying and sharing a body.
In hearing and discussing issues one can come to understand the problem at hand.
For the person who called us(foster parents) idiots, obviously you have starved your brain and that organ in your body is now dead. You are now a walking Zombie.
For the person who commented " foster parents are the same as people on wefare" obviously you haven't met many of them.
 

To the person who said Foster Parents are a step above someone on welfare. What the heck are you thinking! Many foster parents have university degrees, not that this matters, some are doctors, lawyers,social workers,teachers, tradesmen, clergymen, accountants, business owners and the list goes on. I think you get the point. When people like you, speak about something you know nothing about, thats when stories/rumours get started. Foster Parents have hearts of gold, it is NOT about money at all. Here in Ontario, I know personally, foster parents whom are Dr's and many who live in upscale neighbourhoods. They didn't get there by using the welfare system!!!

Injustice buster blog good job!, I will check back again.
 

Donna, the Department and the S.F.F.A. work together to muffle the cries for help from Foster parents.
It's too bad foster parents are afraid to talk. We know what happens when they do. Children are removed.
Mr. Bellanger, please listen to foster parents. They know what is going on. They are NOT second class citizens.
The Managers of D.C.R.E. treat them horribly. The S.F.F.A. pacifies them. Something needs to be done.
 

To the person who commented "take your kids with you. Don't you love them" Of course we love the Foster Childten. We also need quality time with our own family.
Do you take your boss on holidays. Do you take co-workers.
If you do, you're not on holidays, you're on a working retreat.... I think most people would agree that Foster families deserve a break from the Department, Workers and the foster children.
 

Is there only three families in all of Saskatchewan who are disappointed with D.C.R.E. and the S.F.F.A.? I don't think so.
Was there not a petition asking for the resignation of the entire S.F.F.A. board? Was there not over 40 signatures on such?
That works out to be 10%. Someone needs to sharpen their pencils and redo their math.
 

I was one of those foster parents that signed the petition AND I DID NOT KNOW WHAT I WAS SIGNING!!!!!!!!! You and your cohorts wouldn't let me and my family into the children's christmas party unless we signed your petition. Why do you people continue on making this a personel vendetta against our provincial.
 

Much like the controversy surrounding the "safe house" with money mis-management, the Saskatchewan Foster Families Association continues to operate under dubious management and leadership.
I do not understand the minister, Mr. Bellanger, who continues to fund these organizations, and allow the same board members to make the same mistakes over and over.
The Saskatchewan Foster Families Association recieves over 400,000 dollars a year and it goes mainly to travel expenses, meals and honorariums for board members and salary for three or four staff members.
How much money goes toward services for foster families. Very little. Wow. What a waste.
 

To the last postee, how would you know such detailed information? Does the SFFA not get audited each year? So where have you gotten your information from?
 

I am a grateful foster parent who has used the staff at the provincial office for support. They helped me immensely. Please don't assume they are not doing their job or that the money is not well spent. I thank them for helping me through a most sensitive issue. Without them, I don't know where I would be today. I probably would have given up doing something that I love doing, Fostering. I think that some people who are making waves over where the money goes, are barking up the wrong tree. My situation is and was confidential as I am sure every case they are support for is kept confidential. I was assured that even the board members are not told who is receiving support. I will never tell anyone that I needed support from the staff at SFFA because I do not want anyone to even try and guess what it was I was supported for. It is no one else's business. So, please do not attack this organization any more because this is one person out of, I'm sure, many who are thankful they were there when needed. That is what they are funded for, to provide support to us the foster families. I will say it again, just as I said it when you helped me--Thank you Saskatchewan Foster Families Association.
 

One person seems to be terribly confused. The information concerning the S.F.F.A. is a matter of public record.
There are concerned "citizens" who want our government to spend money wisely.
There are many organizations that do not control spending or spend it foolishly. Like the S.F.F.A. Why were the board members not releived of their duties after irregularities were found. This happened not once, but twice.
Citizens have the right to speak out. We have the right to know how taxpayers money is being spent.
 

To the person who said " you and your cohorts wouldn't let me into the Christmas party unless I signed."
You are not telling the truth. No one was or ever would be denied access. It was an informational petition.
It's funny that "some" people resort to lying when all else fails. Those cohorts you refer to are great people. They are still involved in the community, but not the local.
Stick to the facts. Don't lie.
 

Your not very smart to sign something you haven't read. What a moron.
 

I was supported by the SFFA also, both by the staff and a volunteer support person. I appreciated all they did for my family. Hope I never need support of that nature again, but I know if I do, then I will not hesitate to call them. I also have friends who are a foster family and they have used that avenue also, and from what they told mem,they were satisfied also.
 

To the person who signed a petition without reading it. You must be incredibly stupid
 

Well well well. First of all, I would like to tell you how I found this sight. I had a call from a friend of mine and she told me all about it. She said what a scwabbling bunch of foster parents we have out here in Saskatchewan. You guessed it, she's not from this Province, how she found it, I'm not sure. Anyway, if you'll bear with me, it gets even more interesting. I foster out of Saskatoon, a place that I'm sure you are all familiar with.

I have been aware of the inhouse bickering going on within our local for quite some time. It seems there have been a number of incidents where there are a small small number of foster parents who are not happy unless they are causing trouble in one form or another. Let me tell you, I wouldn't want them as enemies. But let me repeat, it is a very very small group of people. It is for that very reason, that I chose not to be involved with our local. Please don't be afraid to move here or become a foster parent. We aren't all like that. Word soon gets around a small city like Saskatoon who the trouble makers are. It took me forever to read all this nonsense. I didn't even get a chance to read Donna Jones' story, I came right to the comments.

I encourage all foster parents to continue fostering as they have in the past. If you don't get involved, the fire can't get any bigger. This foster parent has chosen not to be involved.

Treat Thy Neighbour With Kindness
 

Yeah, I think I heard of that group. From outside of Saskatoon.
Best friends with Executive Director. They do cause a lot of trouble.
 

I have been friends with 3 former Presidents of the Saskatoon local. All had problems with S.F.F.A. and the new Executive Director.
 

That's funny, I was friend's with a past President here in Regina and he to had trouble with the S.F.F.A. and the Executive Director. That's crazy. What is going on with this sffa.
 

As past president of Saskatoon Foster Families Assoc Local Committee I will answer to the comments about myself. Donna ,I do feel for you and agree this can happen to anyone! You did ask me to pass on a letter to a prov member and I did at a liasson mtg., it was skimmed over and handed back to me. I was told to keep it, ( I still have it)!
Along, with you, I know things must change. We only have different views on how this can happen. I truly feel as long as things run provincially ,funded fully by DCRE, nothing can change.
( Don't bite the hand that feeds you") is a remark made at the Nov Presidents mtg when an action plan was asked to be put in place,, all presidents were in agreement for an action plan but......."nough said?"( the action was as simple as a petition to the Minister and as serious as a moritorium on taking further placements.
Also to annonymous?! About the cohorts -I assume I am one, there was no one at the door refusing our families admission and there was one petition asking people to sign IF THEY WERE UNHAPPY WITH THIS PROVINCIAL ASSOC, also one paper where I requested respite, if anyone was availlable to please sign, the last paper was to please sign your name and # if
you could possibly volunteer in the future.
I enjoy this blog, if nothing else comes of it you have open the lines to discussion.
Fostering is as rewarding as it is frustrating. If anyone out there is feeling they could open their hearts and homes to kids in need it is a privelege to make a meaningful difference.
Enter this work with caution, do not be afraid to say no to any placement and know your limitations.
Ask questions and get support from experienced foster parents.
The vast majority of foster parents are respectable, caring compassionate people and don't fit into that "lazy stupid welfare recipient " mould!!!!
My wish would be that all of us had what we need to become Happy ,Healthy, functional parents, and in turn we would help to ensure kids in our care be happy, healthy and functional.
Social workers can also be more healthy, happy and functional if they would receive what they need---Clerical and accounting staff, case aids --then they could do the job they signed up for--SOCIAL WORK !Good Luck! Jackie Sorowski
 

The Saskatchewan Foster Families Association, is funded by Lorne Calvert and his NDP government, therefore is a publicly funded organization or a "community based organization"(CBO).It is not only your right as a tax payer to question how money is spent, it is your obligation as a citizen, to question all government spending, especially if it is used to line the pockets of ill-intentioned wanna-bes.If you think the animosity on this Blog is directed at Donna Jones, you are mistaken. Donna Jones, and Donna I apoligize for this ... is nothing but a puppet for "the powers that be" and we all know who that is...D.D
 

I cannot believe that person was denied access ro a Christmas party before she sighned a petition..Jackie Sorowski was in charge of that petition and anyone that knows Jackie knows what kind of person she is..she is not only a past president, she is the epitome of a good Foster Parent...I have heard social workers say, if they had a kid in care they would want them at Jackie's... I challenge that person to come forward and say to Jackie they were denied access...well, they won't, because it is a blatant LIE.
 

Jackie, thank-you for representing Saskatoon Foster Families for as long as you did. I truly can say you are one of the kindest persons I have known.
You did an outstanding job as President. Too bad The S.F.F.A. and it's Executive Director didn't like or support you. How can we Foster Parents keep volunteers when they are persecuted by the sffa and its new executive director.
Kudos to you and other volunteers who try to help Foster parents but are harrassed and defeated by them.
 

What a tangled web we weave, when at first we practise to decieve.
To the woman who said,"I was denied access...." Why would you LIE like this. You obviously have no class or integrity.
I was at that x-mas party and no such thing ever occurred.
I think I know who you are and I'm disgraced to call you a fellow foster parent.
 

I stand by my Wife and her commitment to Foster parents and children. She volunteered her time and energy to the local association for several years and she was defeated in the end by the S.F.F.A.
For all the D.C.R.E. workers and foster parents who know my wife, I'm sure they would agree, that she did not deserve what she got.
I would challenge any person to come forward and tell me, us foster parents, what she did that hurt or offended any one.
Jackie has respect for other people, treats them kindly, knowing it is, at times, not reciprocated. If this is a "CO-HORT then I am proud to be a so called co-hort.
Treating people with dignity and respect, being truthful and having personal integrity are valuable assets and I think we lost a good president and representative.
Vince Sorowski
 

It has been brought to my attention that someone feels that they were denied access to the Christmas party. I take full responsability for the petition as I was the person sitting at the table. I can assure you no-one was denied access to the party. It would not have even occured to me to tell an adult, let alone a child that they could not enter. There have been references to Jackie as the past president of the local, Jackie at all times was a model of personal integrety and personal accountability. These questions and concerns have been brought forward by many more families than three. Only three families at the Christmas party did not share our concerns about our provincial organization and that is their right. I can disagree with someone on certain issues,but that does not mean I do not like or respect that person. Its not personal, it is a difference of opinion. But I do have an issue with someone saying I was responsable for an unkind act when I was not. Fran Forsberg
 

You are all embarassing yourselves, and you sound like you are in a sewing circle. You don't the board? ELECT them out. It's the democratic way! Oh, wait a minute, the elections just happened!
On behalf of all Foster parents who choose not to participate in sewing circles, end this blog now before more baseless accusations are made by "ANONYMOUS"!
 

I love the fact, that none of you actually addresses any of the intelligent writings on this blog.. you just write about what ever. Why don't you address some of the issues we are talkimg about.We are talking about elections where, we are allowed 4 votes, regardles of the fact we are one of the largest locals in the Prov.
 

The idiot that contradicts yourself...anonymous... go Fuck your self ...you're an idiot...we can tell by your writtings..
 

i won't be back either your all supposed to be intelligent respectful foster parents arent you. wishful thinking enough gossiping and badgering you people will never be happy hope it all works out for Donna
 

May I just say, as a third party looking in, that you ALL deserve $100,000 a year with full benefits and the company Jag because I could NEVER do what you all do 365 days a year.
When I first married into a Foster Family it was bizarre. I thought, “how can these people love and care for other (often) messed up people’s children?”. It truly boggled (and still does) my mind that you’d get paid a 7-11 wage to be a babysitter, psychologist, Dr., teacher, grandma/grandpa, and all around mentor to these kids. I mean, at least people that work at 7-11 get Christmas off!!!!!!!!
What it boils down to is that this is a job. A very tough and time consuming but rewarding job that only few people in this world are capable of dedicating their lives to. You’re obviously not in it for the pay so what are you doing it for? You love the kids and take pride in seeing some of them go home, graduate high school, and grow up and whether they work at Sarcan, become teachers, work at 7-11, or take on Foster Kids of their own some day YOU were a part of that.
If your job becomes all about the politics and the hatred/distrust/anger consumes you then why not either band together to change it or quit. I understand that it’s a huge battle but just like any ‘job’ if you don’t like something then work to amend it.
If I told every co-worker what I thought about them and why I didn’t like what they were doing I’d be out of a job or else sitting in the hall eating my lunch by myself.
Wouldn’t it make more sense (again…third party here!) to band together to receive better pay, less crowded homes, and more assistance all around than to attempt to beat The National Enquirer circulation?
May I also contradict myself for one moment by saying that I was at that said Christmas party and all I saw was my husband (who won’t even dance with me) spinning around the floor with ridiculously happy Foster Kids and a Santa who I dearly loved letting 50+ kids tell them what they wanted while the parents had a good time watching the kids have a good time.
I may not always be the best ‘married into the family and now I have 3 sometimes 10 foster siblings-in-law’ but my mom and dad-in-law and people like yourselves have made a person who can’t even stand the neighbors dog for 5 minutes, love kids that I’d normally not look twice at. I admire your profession (but am not up for recruitment at anytime!) and urge you to move forward to make it a better ‘work environment’.
 

Correction to previous ramblings:
Different Christmas party but the same idea! My husband does like to spin and dance though.
 

Indeed the elections were just held. Were they fair elections. NO. A Saskatoon Delegate who ran for member at large heard two women say about her, "that's so and so from Saskatoon, the one we were told not to vote for."
I think it's common practise for the board and Executive Director to tell people who to vote for.
Corrupt, Corrupt, Corrupt. The Executive Director does not want any one from Saskatoon to win because nearly everyone knows her and her ways.
 

I remember reading this story for a few weeks and not one comment in blogs I make one despairinging comment and everyone chirps in,anyway I guess from that following tirade you have all answered my original Question "Why would anyone want to be a Foster parent" my best wishes to all children in the system and overall a journey not without it's perils/yours truly / Allan
 

Can't foster parents start a union or something. If you all banded together you could make a difference.
The present Government should be ashamed of themselves for the way thgey treat Foster parents.
 

indeed... a union would be great... however foster-parents have no taxable income... we wish we did... with paying taxes would come some power... some benefits, sick time, vacation time. who knows maybe we could retire at 65, with a pension... for some reason we are not supported in being tax paying citizens. as it is.. no power, no medical, no insurance, no benefits, no retirement... all financial risk is on your own shoulders... many of us have been involved 20+ years . we know what it would take to get new foster parents to stick it out..
i just read all these letters.. very interesting.. i smiled over the one regarding f.p. being welfare recipients.. if we were, we could have had dental, optical and prescription coverage...
we are doing a job that is beating us.. the thing is without us where do the kids go and whose responsibility would it be?
we do love our kids..
 

"Indeed the elections were just held. Were they fair elections. NO. A Saskatoon Delegate who ran for member at large heard two women say about her, "that's so and so from Saskatoon, the one we were told not to vote for."
I think it's common practise for the board and Executive Director to tell people who to vote for.
Corrupt, Corrupt, Corrupt. The Executive Director does not want any one from Saskatoon to win because nearly everyone knows her and her ways."

Hold the phone here. This is the problem of this thread filled with accusations that are unfounded. Your comments about being told who to vote for contradicts the fact that it was a secret ballot complete with scrutineers from each delegate. What gets put down on the ballot is indicative of the true wishes of the voters present at the Annual General Meeting. Everything else is simply hearsay and repeated here as "truth". If you were there, did you have someone standing over your shoulder peering down at your ballot telling you what to check off? Did you hand your ballot to someone to put it in the box for you?
If the elections were not fair, why didn't someone call foul at the meeting? We don't live in a country where armed guerillas point assualt rifles at you while you vote. Your perception that it wasn't a fair election based upon hearsay that people were told who to vote for or not vote for(Although I never heard those comments while at the AGM from anyone, and I spoke with many, many delegate)in itself indicates you have a problem with our political system today. During the Federal elections, I recived calls from campaign workers telling me why I shouldn't vote for so and so. Are the Federal elections now declared unfair? When I cast each of my ballots, I did so for the canidates that I knew and who I believe will represent us. I was a little dismayed that it was a one horse race for President, but having said that, I would have voted for him anyway. I feel you should share these comments with the President and the board, and see how they feel that you felt the elections were "corrupt, corrupt, corrupt". Then, please change the democratically elected board (by you remember)by running in the next election and campaign. Oh, and in order to campaign, you need to tell people why you would better serve the SFFA than the next guy (but you can't I guess, because that would be telling people how to vote....hmmm...what a conflict).
 

I agree and wish we all have been around long enough to "get it"
I heard a phrse used at a local meeting in Saskatoon,about how we stay so quiet about problems and it was emotional blackmail, thats what sums it up for me, I dont want to get to involved cause of my kids but I know theres bad stuff going on.
 

"Emotional Blackmail"!
 

I had to sit back and rethink the corrupt comments again. I left one small point out that proves no one was told who NOT to vote for. If I remember correctly, the eligible delegates running for the member at large position, were not announced until all nominations were in, which occured moments before the election was held at the AGM. Moments before the election, the names of the canidates were written on a board and each canidate got to speak to us just before we voted. We wrote those names down on a blank ballot. So, how did two people get to talk about who not to vote for, when the canidates were not even known until it was time to vote? Remember, the constitution allowed for delegates running for member at large to be nominated at the AGM, therefore, we all had to write the delegates names on a blank ballot. So...how did someone go around telling who not to vote for? IT DIDN'T HAPPEN! IT COULDN'T HAVE! Also, I foster as well as you, and it's because of them I choose to speak.
 

The comments were said. I could also bring forward at least two or three people who have been TOLD who to vote for at different P.A.G.M.'s.
Whatever someone writes in, whether it's about holiday's or better pay or vote rigging YOU are there to dispute it. The department and the S.F.F.A. have a good friend. Someone who doesn't want better pay. Someone who doesn't want respite or holidays even though the Department requests Foster Parents take their five day respite in a block. Someone who believes the S.F.F.A. and the department. How can you defend Donna when you believe the Department is doing all the right things;
Perhaps you're not a Foster parent but an employee. I just can't believe a foster parent thinks the Department and the S.F.F.A. are wonderful institutions.
Its about morality and respect. Did the Department treat Donna with respect. NO. That's how they treat a lot of foster parent's.
I'm glad you are so happy with everything. It just so happens that there are some of us who are not.
We will continue to voice our concerns. Oh, if you want to come forward I would be happy to supply you with a list of disgruntled Foster parents and the names of the people who witnessed first hand vote rigging.
 

I would like to add something the previous writer said about vote rigging. I was told by a member of the S.F.F.A. who to "not" vote for in 2004.
I think staff of the sffa and board members should not be allowed to lobby for who they want on the board.
Most people who run for positions do not have the resources to travel and explain their position.
So if someone on the board doesn't like him/her they simply tell everyone that that person is not a good choice.
It does happen. Vote-rigging may be the wrong choice of words. Friendly persausion may be a better term.
 

well I have been following this blog...wow what a debate. When it all comes down to things...as a foster parent I can say I have had my share of problems with the Saskatoon department but for my local department where I am...I couldnt ask for any better support. When it comes right down to it...as much problems as I have had...I still do it for the need for the kids. I agree we do not get paid enough for some of the children we do get but I did not get into fostering for the money...and that is the truth. We are the type of foster parents that give 100% of their maintenance right back to the kids and then more from our regular wages from outside careers. Believe me if I was doing it for the money and all the shit I have dealt with in the past, there is no way I would have lasted 5 years. I love the kids and I love what I do. The department definately has its problems which needs repairs in their policies and some of the workers need to step back and look at what we do. Just because we do not have a social worker degree does not mean what we do is anything less. I have come across a few workers that treat foster families like dirt or without considering our needs or feelings. As for Donna's blogs I just felt she said too much about the kids and naming the workers on here was inappriopate but also if I had to deal with what she did...i would be angry enough as well. AS foster parents we need to stick together and get results with the department.
 

I find the first comment about CHILDREN #1 and #2... horriffic! These are children that for whatever reason (abondonment, parents alchohol and drug abuse invitro, poor parenting or no parenting skills etc) THEY are HUMAN BEINGS and that "abortion on demand" shows what kind of "human" that ANONYMOUS person said. It is sad that Social Services is not more capable of serving the ppl they HIRE to be foster parents. I know first hand what kind of treatment foster parents get and the little if at all help they receive from the Dept. Donna.. if ur heart is in a good place.. u will be ok.. and BLOGs are for everyone.. just because u don't agree or don't educate yourself about someone's input.. then keep ur fingers offa da keyboard! SPEAK UP..silence solves NOTHING.
JoJo
 

WENATCHEE / WASHINGTON / WITCH HUNT

http://robtshepherd.tripod.com/wenatchee.html

Paul Craig Roberts

Washington Times (DC)

Two decades ago hysterical liberals created a monster, an unaccountable Gestapo known today as Child Protective Services. Crazed therapists testified before Congress that 75 percent of parents were child abusers and that a new national bureaucracy was necessary to protect children. Congress obliged the therapists' request and unleashed a Frankenstein.

Several years ago the local CPS in Wenatchee, Washington, got the word from the state office to find some cases to justify its budget. Thus began a modern day Salem Witch Hunt that resulted in the arrest of 43 adults on 30,000 counts of sex abuse against 60 children.

It was all a fabrication to justify a budget.

Many of the accused were poor and uneducated. When a local pastor, Robert Roberson, came to their aid, he and his wife were arrested on child sex abuse charges and held on million dollar bonds. Part of Pastor Roberson's lesson from the corrupt police was jail beatings.

When Roberson's case went to trial, the falsity of the charges against him were obvious. The Witch Hunt had overreached. Roberson was acquitted, and this was a turning point.

Another turning point was Juana Vasquez, the director of Child Welfare Services in Wenatchee who challenged the charges brought against Robert Devereaux, a kindly man who operated a foster home for children. Her integrity got her fired.

This was another mistake by the witch hunters drunk with their power. Mrs. Vasquez was a woman of steel. The daughter of migrant farm workers who worked her way through college and became dean of admissions at Gonzaga University, she could not be intimidated.

She took a stand against the injustice and beat the authorities in a law suit that awarded her $1.57 million.

One outcome is that the City of Wenatchee has paid Mr. Devereaux $209,000 to drop his suit for malicious prosecution and wrongful arrest.

Pastor Roberson, Mrs. Vasquez and a few others had the courage to stand up to evil and expose the witch hunt. The state Court of Appeals has overturned six cases, handing down rulings highly critical of the police, trial judges, prosecutors and public defenders.

Eleven people remain wrongfully imprisoned awaiting their appeals.

Mrs. Vasquez died on April 29 of brain cancer. She was 48 years old and is survived by eight children and her husband. Mrs. Vasquez and one county commissioner were the only public officials with the courage to challenge the witch hunt. The local newspaper and radio station and the local elites all went along with the false charges.

"I wish I had more time to see this through, to see those from Wenatchee, the innocent people wrongly imprisoned, freed from their cells," were among Mrs. Vasquez's last words. "There are others who have a responsibility to do something, but who stand silent. Our governor still turns his head.

"Janet Reno looks the other way. The legislature does a little, but not enough. Wenatchee can happen again in this state unless the citizens and the government voice their outrage."

Pastor Roberson, Mrs. Vasquez and a brave few helped to end the deafening silence. A Spokane TV station took up the investigation and helped to expose the witch hunt. Then the Seattle Post-Intelligencer turned loose two investigative reporters.

The facts are now in. Public authorities in the state of Washington framed numerous people on false charges and put their children out for adoption. Prosecutors brought the false cases to trial or to plea bargains. Trial judges looked the other way, playing see no evil, hear no evil.

When the sordid witch hunt was exposed, the state responded by appointing commissions. All of the public authorities who framed innocent people remain at large. No indictments have been brought against those responsible for one of the greatest abuses of public power in our history.

And we are supposed to trust government?

-----------------------------

Gerry Duffett

14-4218 Lawrence Ave E Box 218
Scarborough Ontario
Canada M1E4X9

gerryduffett47@yahoo.com
gerryduffett@fastmail.ca

Pager # 416-612-5689

http://gerryduffett.proboards54.com/index.cgi?board=general
 



Links to this post:

Create a Link


Post a Comment

return to injusticebustersblog main page

Google
WWW injusticebustersblog